Beverly Monroe had been raised to be a proper southern lady. She had a masters degree in organic chemistry and a good job in the patent department of Philip Morris. Nonetheless, a jury wrongly convicted her of murdering the man she loved.
He had a grand name, Roger Zygmunt Comte de la Burde, and led a grand life, at least until he ended it with a bullet in March 1992. He had emigrated from Poland - that was for sure - and claimed noble birth, but that wasn’t so sure.
With a Ph.D. in chemistry, de la Burde worked for years at Philip Morris, inventing ways to improve tobacco processing; one invention reportedly saved the company $300 million. However, de la Burde and Philip Morris eventually parted ways over a patent dispute.
He also collected and sold works of art, although some were fakes, just counterfeits weathered on his roof to look old and authentic. Federal investigators had already begun making a case against de la Burde at the time he shot himself.
Men viewed him with suspicion and some considered him ruthless. Many women, though, found de la Burde irresistible. Beverly Monroe, who met him through their work at the tobacco company, continued to love him even though she knew that he had affairs with other women.
Somehow, de la Burde also found time for wheeling and dealing in land. He lived on a large estate near Richmond, Virginia.
Despite all his wealth, de la Burde was miserable. Some witnesses described him as obsessive, paranoid, and depressed. It didn’t help that federal agents were closing in on his art scam.
On March 4, 1992, Monroe had dinner with de la Burde but left at about 9:30 p.m., arriving at her home a half hour later. She spoke with her son and then drove to a local grocery store.
The next morning, she returned to de la Burde’s estate. She and the caretaker found de la Burde on the couch, dead, a pistol in his right hand.
According to Monroe, Riley pressured her into signing a statement that she had been present at de la Burde’s death by threatening to arrest her if she didn’t. She quoted Riley telling her that he had never lost a murder case, that he could twist her words so that no one would believe her, and that he could make her out to be “the biggest black widow spider of all time.”
Riley had an effective tactic. Even if he couldn’t intimidate a witness into falsely admitting a crime, he could bully the person into admitting some “fact” which might seem minor but which would be damaging in court.
In another case Riley investigated, there had been no evidence that the man Riley targeted had been near the murder scene at the time of the crime. However, with a combination of suggestion and intimidation, Riley got his suspect to admit he had been driving near the woman’s home at the time she was killed and had stopped to urinate by the side of the road.
But it hadn’t happened! It was Riley’s invention, a suggestion he pressured the suspect into believing.
Years later, after the detective had retired, Riley admitted to a reporter that, while interrogating the man, he had told him: “You probably had to relieve yourself - I didn’t use those words because men don’t use those words - but I said, ‘You probably stopped to relieve yourself on the side of the road.’”
The man had been convicted and years of appeals failed. However, the mounting evidence of innocence was so powerful that the governor granted a pardon. This past April, the Virginia legislature enacted a special law paying him almost 1.7 million dollars in compensation for the 32 years he spent in prison. That law specifically stated that “Virginia State Police Special Agent David Riley has a documented history of misconduct.”
In Beverly Monroe’s case, Riley’s intimidating tactics had devastating effects. Monroe had a good alibi: A time-stamped grocery store receipt showing that she had been miles away at the estimated time of de la Burde’s death. She even had a witness who had seen her at the store. However, her signed statement contradicted that evidence and placed her at the scene when de la Burde died. The change in her story also raised doubts about her honesty.
Riley’s coercive interrogation wasn’t the only misconduct in Monroe’s case. At trial, the prosecution called a woman who testified that Monroe had tried to buy a gun from her. That was a lie, but the prosecution didn’t disclose to Monroe’s lawyer that the woman had an incentive to lie. She had been charged with a firearms offense but, in return for her testimony, the prosecution agreed to drop the charge.
The prosecution withheld other information from the defense, but that misconduct did not come to light until years later. Monroe spent the meantime in prison.
She went through her savings and then sold her house to pay legal expenses. But Monroe still might be in prison if it weren’t for a tireless advocate, her daughter Kathryn.
Monroe then went to federal district court, which did grant the writ. However, the state appealed.
In a long, thorough opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit upheld the district court. After 11 years in prison, Monroe found freedom.
And her daughter Katie found her calling. She became executive director of the Rocky Mountain Innocence Project and is now executive director of Healing Justice, a new organization working to make the justice system better, so that wrongful convictions like her mother’s no longer occur.